Home › Explainers › Eddy heat flux

100 hPa eddy heat flux

Also called: eddy heat flux, meridional eddy heat flux, v'T', vT 100 hPa, upward wave activity, vertical E-P flux

The zonal-mean poleward eddy heat flux $[v'T']$ at 100 hPa is the most direct measure of how much planetary-wave activity is leaving the troposphere for the stratosphere. It is proportional to the vertical component of the Eliassen–Palm flux, $F^{(z)}\propto f\,\overline{v'\theta'}/\bar\theta_z$, so a large positive value means waves are propagating upward into the polar vortex.

Why amplitude is not enough

A large planetary wave is not necessarily moving upward. A wave that is vertically stacked carries almost no heat flux; one whose ridges and troughs tilt westward with height carries a lot. Maps of wave amplitude show where the wave sits, and the heat flux shows whether it is going up.

How it leads the vortex

The live forecast

The flux is averaged over 45–75° in each hemisphere (positive is poleward in both), computed for the AIFS control and 25 perturbed members and then averaged: like every quadratic diagnostic, the flux of the ensemble-mean fields would fade with lead time. Zonal wavenumbers 1–72 are kept so that the forecast resolves the same eddies as the 1991–2020 NCEP/NCAR reanalysis climatology it is compared with. The panels show the daily flux, its wave-1 and wave-2 parts, the trailing 40-day mean standardized, and the flux by latitude through the forecast.

Open the eddy heat flux on the stratosphere page
100 hPa zonal-mean eddy heat flux 45–75°N: AIFS-ENS members against the 1991–2020 climatology, wave-1 and wave-2 parts, 40-day mean
Northern Hemisphere, 45–75°N. The Southern Hemisphere version is on the stratosphere page.

References

  1. Newman, P. A., E. R. Nash, and J. E. Rosenfield, 2001: What controls the temperature of the Arctic stratosphere during the spring? J. Geophys. Res., 106, 19999–20010.
  2. Polvani, L. M., and D. W. Waugh, 2004: Upward wave activity flux as a precursor to extreme stratospheric events and subsequent anomalous surface weather regimes. J. Climate, 17, 3548–3554.
  3. Andrews, D. G., J. R. Holton, and C. B. Leovy, 1987: Middle Atmosphere Dynamics. Academic Press.